Boardroom-grade
decks that
move decisions.

The deck that gets funded. The board paper that lands the vote. We take your brief, sign the NDA before touching a file, and a human strategist shapes every slide — so what you send looks like it came from the best room in the building.

See the difference →
NDA signed first
before any file is shared
Human reviewed
every single deck
Strategy · 2028 Plan
01 · Executive Summary
02 · Market Position
03 · Financial Outlook
04 · Strategic Initiatives
Board Deck · Q4 2025
Performance & Forward Guidance
£2.4bn
Revenue
+18%
YoY
Live demo
$4.2bnConsideration
$156mRun-rate synergies
+14%EPS accretion yr 1
2.8×Entry multiple
Yr 3FCF payback
Investment Committee — Board Recommendation
Acquisition of Target Co. Group plc
Strategic Rationale & Value Case — Acquirer Corp.
01 — Strategic Fit
Accelerates #2 position in enterprise workflow
Target Co. holds 18% EU share — Acquirer Corp.'s fastest-growing segment. Collapses a 3-year organic build to 14 months.
18%
EU market share post-deal
02 — Synergy Value
$156m run-rate by Year 3 — conservative case
58% cost and 42% revenue synergies. Cross-sell into Acquirer Corp.'s 4,200-client base. Upside excludes $34m AI-platform revenue.
$156m
Net synergies — base case
03 — Financial Impact
+14% EPS accretion Year 1 on pre-synergy basis
Deal is accretive before any synergy realisation. Post-synergy EPS uplift reaches +23% by Year 3.
+23%
EPS uplift by Year 3
04 — Timing Rationale
Exclusivity window closes 28 June — two competing bidders
Two competing strategic bidders confirmed. Board approval by 19 June required to maintain exclusivity.
19 Jun
Board approval required
Recommendation
"Proceed to exclusivity and SPA negotiation"
IC approval sought for $4.2bn all-cash offer at 2.8× forward revenue.
Regulatory riskLow
Mgmt retentionConfirmed
FinancingCommitted
Deadline28 Jun
Risk Summary
IntegrationMedium
Synergy deliveryLow
Key manMedium
RegulatoryLow
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Acquirer Corp.04 / 22
$156mBase synergies
$190mUpside case
+14%/+23%EPS yr1/yr3
3 scenariosSensitivity
Financial & Synergy Detail — Working Group
Target Co. Acquisition — Value Case & Sensitivity Analysis
Acquirer Corp. · IC Working Pack
Synergy CategoryBase ($m)Upside ($m)Downside ($m)Year
Headcount consolidation627448Yr 1–2
Procurement & vendor293622Yr 2
Property & facilities182214Yr 1
Total cost synergies10913284—
Cross-sell — existing clients344220Yr 2–3
Revenue platform upsell13340Yr 3+
Total revenue synergies477620—
Integration one-off costs(58)(52)(68)Yr 1–2
Net run-rate synergies (Yr 3)$156m$190m$104m 
EPS Sensitivity — Synergy Delivery vs Entry Multiple
Synergy delivery2.4×2.8×3.2×
Upside ($190m)+28%+23%+17%
Base ($156m)+20%+14%+9%
Downside ($104m)+11%+5%+0%
Synergy Bridge — Base Case
Headcount
$62m
Procurement
$29m
Property
$18m
Cross-sell
$34m
Platform
$13m
Integration
($58m)
Net run-rate
$156m
Key assumptions: 340 FTE reduction over 24 months. 8% cross-sell penetration by Yr 3. Platform upsell excluded from IC base case — upside only.
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Acquirer Corp. / Working Group07 / 22
4Workstreams
5 stepsPer track
100 daysFull integration
IMOGoverned
Integration Management — 100-Day Plan Overview
Post-Acquisition Integration — Workstream Map
Acquirer / Target Co. · IMO Summary
Client / Commercial
Day 0–15Day 1 comms
→
Day 15–30Retention plan
→
Day 31–60Cross-sell pilot
→
Day 61–90Unified pricing
→
Day 90Synergy confirmed
People & Org
Day 0–15IMO live
→
Day 15–45Retention packages
→
Day 45–70Org design final
→
Day 70–90Redundancies
→
Technology
Day 0–30Architecture audit
→
Day 30–50Data mapping
→
Day 50–75CRM migration
→
Day 75–90Legacy decommission
→
Finance & Reporting
→
Day 20–45Accounts aligned
→
Day 45–70Combined mgmt a/c
→
Day 70–90Consolidated live
→
Phase →
STABILISE · Day 0–30
CONSOLIDATE · Day 31–60
OPTIMISE · Day 61–90
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — IMO Working Group03 / 18
How it works

Brief us like a colleague.
Receive it like it came from McKinsey.

01
Submit your brief
We sign an NDA before a single file is reviewed. You submit a brief — deal type, context, deadline, and any source materials.
02
AI builds. Strategist reviews.
Domain-tuned AI drafts the deck structure and narrative. A human strategist reads your brief and reviews the output against your actual deal context — not just grammar.
03
Boardroom-ready PPTX delivered
Editable PPTX, no watermarks, human sign-off included. One revision round built in. Looks and reads like it came from a top-tier advisory.
Deckr · Brief Intake
NDA executed
d
Hi — NDA is executed. Tell me about the deck. What's the deal and when do you need it?
IC board paper for a $4.2bn all-cash acquisition of Target Co. Two competing bidders. Exclusivity closes 28 June — need the full deck in 4 days.
d
Got it. Parsed your brief:
ARCHETYPE Acquisition Board Paper
DEADLINE 4 business days · 18–22 slides
CONTEXT $4.2bn · exclusivity 28 Jun · 2 bidders
Scope confirmed. Building now.
Add source materials or context…
Deckr Studio — Slide in Progress
Strategist reviewing
$156m
Base synergies
$190m
Upside case
+14%
EPS accretion
Financial & Synergy Detail — Working Group
Target Co. Acquisition — Value Case & Sensitivity Analysis
CategoryBaseUpside
Headcount$62m$74m
Procurement$29m$36m
Total cost syns$109m$132m
Cross-sell$34m$42m
Integration costs($58m)($52m)
Net run-rate (Yr 3)$156m$190m
Value Bridge
Headcount
$62m
Cross-sell
$34m
Integration
($58m)
Strategist note
"Synergy waterfall restructured to lead cost. Upside excluded from base case per IC preference."
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Acquirer Corp.07 / 22
Delivered — Slide 01 / 22
Human reviewed · PPTX ready
$4.2bn
Consideration
$156m
Net synergies
+14%
EPS Yr 1
2.8×
Entry multiple
Executive Summary · Investment Committee · Board Recommendation
Target Co. Acquisition — Purpose & Resolution Sought
The board is asked to approve the transaction at the meeting of 19 June 2026
RESOLUTION SOUGHT
1.Approve proposed consideration of $4.2bn and transaction terms as set out in the draft SPA (Appendix C)
2.Delegate authority to CEO and CFO to execute the SPA within parameters defined herein, with financing commitment confirmed
3.Approve integration governance framework and mandate for 100-day IMO
STRATEGIC FIT
Accelerates EU leadership by 3 years
18%EU share
VALUE CREATION
$156m net synergies · IRR 22%
+14%EPS Yr 1
MANAGEMENT VIEW
"Strongly recommend approval. Optimal timing — window closes 28 June."
Deckr · Strictly Private & Confidential · DCK-2026-XXXX 01 / 22
Why Deckr

You already know what
a great deck needs to do.

The gap is bandwidth, not judgment. Here's what that costs without us.

Without Deckr
✕
3–5 days of analyst time
Building narrative logic, slide structure, and visual design from scratch — every single deck.
✕
Generic AI that doesn't know M&A
ChatGPT or Claude.ai produce bullet walls. You spend more time fixing than you saved.
✕
Your deal data on public servers
Every prompt you type into a public AI is logged. No NDA. No deletion. No control.
✕
No human catches what AI misses
Logic errors, wrong framing, weak IC narrative — nobody reviews it before it goes to the board.
✕
You're the designer too
Hours adjusting fonts, alignment, and slide density — when you should be on the deal.
With Deckr
✓
48 hours. You brief, we build.
Submit a brief. Receive a boardroom-quality deck. Your time goes back to the deal.
✓
Domain-tuned for M&A, board & strategy
8 archetype-specific systems — IC papers, board packs, options papers, integration maps.
✓
NDA before we see a file. Private API.
Contractually isolated. Your data is never on a public platform. Deleted on delivery.
✓
Strategist reviews every slide
A human reads your brief and checks narrative logic against your actual deal context.
✓
Editable PPTX. Zero watermarks.
Looks like it came from a top advisory. Because the logic did.
Use cases

Pick a use case.
See the exact output.

Each archetype has different narrative logic, different visual structure, different stakes. Click to see what Deckr produces.

M&A · Buy-side · IC Board Recommendation
15–22 slides · 4–5 day turnaround
$4.2bn
Consideration
$156m
Run-rate synergies
+14%
EPS Yr 1
2.8×
Entry multiple
Investment Committee · Board Recommendation
Acquisition of Target Co. Group plc
Management Recommendation — Approve transaction terms, authority limits and integration approach
STRATEGIC FIT
Accelerates EU market position — 3yr organic build compressed to 14 months
18%EU share post-deal
VALUATION & RETURNS
2.8× fwd rev · IRR 22% · EPS accretive pre-synergy from close
Yr 3FCF payback
SYNERGIES
$156m net run-rate by Yr 3 — 58% cost, 42% revenue · confidence high
$156mbase case net
FINANCING
All-cash · committed facilities · leverage 2.6× ND/EBITDA — within policy
2.6×ND/EBITDA at close
Board Recommendation
"Approve transaction terms and authority to negotiate within defined parameters. Proceed to exclusivity and SPA."
RegulatoryLow risk
DD findingsMitigated
Mgmt retentionConfirmed
Board deadline19 Jun
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Client Corp.04 / 22
Divestment · Portfolio Reshaping · Board Paper
14–20 slides · 4–5 day turnaround
£380m
Indicative range
£28m
Stranded costs
Full disposal
Preferred route
18 mo
TSA duration
Board Paper · Portfolio Reshaping Rationale
Divestment of Non-Core Division
Approve divestment perimeter, preferred route, and authority to execute · Delegation to management
STRATEGIC RATIONALE — WHY DIVEST NOW
Non-core to Group strategy — sub-scale at £180m revenue vs minimum efficient scale of £300m
ROIC of 6% vs 14% Group hurdle — capital better deployed in core growth platforms
Competitive M&A window open — 3 credible strategic buyers identified with synergy premium potential
OPTIONS EVALUATED
Option A
Retain & fix
Rejected — 3yr drag
Option B
JV / partial
Rejected — complexity
Option C ✓
Full disposal
Recommended
SEPARATION PERIMETER & TSA
RemainCo
Core platforms · 4,200 enterprise clients · £1.2bn rev
NewCo (divest)
Non-core division · £180m rev · 340 FTE in scope
TSA: 18 months · IT, Finance, HR · estimated £4m/yr cost
Recommendation
"Approve perimeter and full-disposal route. Delegate authority to management to run competitive process."
Buyer universe
Strategic — sectorHigh fit
PE — industrialMedium
Indicative value£340–420m
Process launchQ3 2026
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Client Corp.03 / 18
Governance · Board Pack & Review · Quarterly
12–18 slides · 48hr turnaround
Q2 2026
Period
+12%
Revenue YoY
3 of 4
KPIs on track
2 items
Decisions required
Board Pack · Q2 2026 · Performance & Governance Review
Performance Dashboard & Capital Allocation
Note performance · Approve committee recommendations · Confirm governance actions
PERFORMANCE DASHBOARD — Q2 2026
Revenue
£312m
+12% YoY · ✓ Plan
EBITDA
34%
Margin · ✓ Plan
Capex
£48m
+6m vs plan · ⚠ Watch
NPS
+62
+4 pts · ✓ On track
RISK & COMPLIANCE HIGHLIGHTS
GDPR — 1 minor breach self-reported. Remediated.Closed
Capex overrun — Site B construction delay. Monitor.Watch
Cyber — 2 phishing attempts blocked. No breach.Contained
Decisions Required
Approve £80m capex
Site B expansion — paper in pack, p.12
Ratify M&A mandate
Delegation of authority up to £500m
CEO SUMMARY
"H2 on plan. Capex watch maintained. M&A mandate ratification sought to preserve optionality."
Deckr — Board Confidential — Client Corp.02 / 14
Strategy · Options Paper · Executive Review
14–20 slides · 4–5 day turnaround
4 options
Evaluated
Option 2
Recommended
£18m
Investment reqd
18 mo
To market
Strategic Options Paper · Executive Review
APAC Market Entry — Options & Recommendation
Select preferred option · Set direction for Phase 1 implementation · Approve initial resourcing
COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT — AGAINST AGREED CRITERIA
CriteriaOrganicJV ✓AcquireLicence
Growth potential●●○●●●●●●●○○
Capital required●●●●○○●●●○○○
Speed to market●○○●●○●●●●●○
Risk profile●●●●●○●●●●○○
● = high · ○ = low (lower is better for capital & risk)
IMPLEMENTATION — PHASE 1 NEXT STEPS
Q3 2026
Partner selection
Q4 2026
JV term sheet
Q1 2027
JV close
Q3 2027
Market launch
Recommendation
"Select JV with local partner as preferred option. Approve £18m Phase 1 resourcing. Board re-engaged at term sheet stage."
Investment£18m
Expected IRR24%
Key riskPartner fit
Deckr — Strictly Confidential — Exec Strategy Review05 / 17
Transformation · Operating Model · Board Endorsement
16–24 slides · 5 day turnaround
4
Workstreams
£22m
Benefit yr 3
£8.4m
Programme cost
2.8yr
Payback
Operating Model Redesign · Board Endorsement
Finance Function Transformation — Programme Approval
Endorse TOM design · Approve programme funding & phased roadmap · Confirm change governance
CASE FOR CHANGE — CURRENT VS FUTURE STATE
CURRENT STATE
Close cycle: 12 days · Industry avg 4
60% manual processing — no automation
12 ERP instances across 8 geographies
FUTURE STATE (TOM)
Close cycle: 3 days · Best-in-class
80% automated · SSC model live
Single ERP · Standardised globally
PHASED ROADMAP & INVESTMENT CASE
Phase 1 · H1 2026
Design & mobilise
£2.1m
TOM design · ERP vendor selection
Phase 2 · H2 2026
Build & pilot
£4.2m
ERP build · SSC pilot · Benefits begin
Phase 3 · 2027
Scale & embed
£2.1m
Global rollout · Full run-rate
Board Ask
"Endorse TOM design principles. Approve £8.4m programme funding. Delegate Phase 1 execution to CEO."
Investment case
Run-rate benefit£22m/yr
NPV£48m
Payback2.8 years
People in scope320 FTE
Deckr — Confidential — Finance Transformation Programme06 / 21
Before / After

The Deckr difference

Three real-world archetypes. Two detail levels. Drag to reveal the Deckr output — drag left to see what generic AI produces.

Before — generic AIAfter Deckr ✓
Acquisition Rationale — Target Co. GroupDRAFT v1.4 — Internal Only
Strategic Rationale for Acquisition of Target Co. Group
Prepared by Corp Dev | For Management Review
  • Strong market position — Target Co. holds leading share in enterprise workflow automation sector with 2,300+ enterprise clients globally
  • Revenue synergies expected — cross-selling opportunities with existing client base estimated at $40–60m; integration timeline 18–24 months
  • Management team continuity — CEO and CTO indicated willingness to stay post-acquisition subject to acceptable retention packages
  • EBITDA margins above sector average — 34% EBITDA margin vs 26% sector average; cost synergies from headcount and procurement overlap
  • Technology fit — SaaS platform architecture compatible with Acquirer Corp.'s existing tech stack; estimated 12-month integration window
  • Board recommends proceeding — subject to confirmatory due diligence and moving to exclusivity and detailed SPA negotiation
Source: Corp Dev preliminary analysis. All figures subject to confirmatory diligence. Not for external distribution.
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL — CLIENT CORP. INTERNAL USE ONLY  |  Page 4 of 22
$4.2bnConsideration
$156mRun-rate synergies
+14%EPS accretion yr 1
2.8× revEntry multiple
Yr 3FCF payback
Investment Committee — Board Recommendation
Acquisition of Target Co. Group plc
Strategic Rationale & Value Case — Acquirer Corp.
01 — STRATEGIC FIT
Accelerates #2 position in enterprise workflow
Target Co. holds 18% share in EU enterprise workflow — Acquirer Corp.'s fastest-growing segment. Collapses a 3-year organic build to 14 months.
18%
EU market share post-deal
02 — SYNERGY VALUE
$156m run-rate by Year 3 — conservative case
58% cost (headcount, procurement, property) and 42% revenue. Upside case excludes $34m AI-platform digital revenue.
$156m
Net synergies — base case
03 — FINANCIAL IMPACT
+14% EPS accretion Year 1 on pre-synergy basis
Deal is accretive before any synergy realisation. Post-synergy EPS uplift reaches +23% by Year 3. Leverage stays within policy at 2.6× net debt/EBITDA.
+23%
EPS uplift by Year 3
04 — TIMING RATIONALE
Exclusivity window closes 28 June — two competing bidders confirmed
Two competing strategic bidders confirmed. Target Co. management signalled preference for Acquirer Corp.. Board approval by 19 June required.
19 Jun
Board approval required
Recommendation
"Proceed to exclusivity and SPA negotiation"
IC approval sought for $4.2bn all-cash offer at 2.8× forward revenue.
Regulatory riskLow
Mgmt retentionConfirmed
FinancingCommitted
Exclusivity deadline28 Jun
Risk Summary
Integration executionMedium
Synergy deliveryLow
Key man dependencyMedium
Regulatory / antitrustLow
Deckr — Strictly Private & Confidential — Acquirer Corp.04 / 22
← DRAG TO COMPARE →
Pricing

Straightforward. No scope creep.

Three tiers matched to real workflows. Scope confirmed on a short discovery call.

Quick Deck
$150–220
per deck
⟶ 48-hour turnaround
Short briefs with your outline — we execute and design at domain quality. 8–12 slides.
  • 8–12 slides
  • Single audience cut
  • Structure provided by you
  • AI draft + human review
  • Editable PPTX delivery
  • NDA signed
Core offer
Full Deal Deck
$420–720
per deck
⟶ 4–5 day turnaround
Full narrative through board-ready PPTX — discovery call, architecture, exec + working cuts.
  • 15–25 slides
  • Discovery call included
  • Full narrative architecture
  • Exec + working version cuts
  • Domain expert review
  • NDA executed pre-work
  • 1 revision round included
Monthly Retainer
$300–480
per month · 3-month minimum
⟶ 2 decks/month + priority SLA
For steady board cadences. Priority turnaround and retained context. Existing clients only.
  • 2 decks per month
  • Priority 48hr SLA
  • Standing context — no re-briefing
  • Monthly standing NDA
  • Brand template customisation
FAQs

Everything you need to know

Can't find what you're looking for? Send us a message directly.

Mutual NDA first. CIMs and models run only in our private, controlled environment — not public chat UIs. After delivery, working files are purged. We don't train on or retain your content.
Domain-tuned slide logic, not a one-shot prompt. Every file is read by a human who understood the brief. Your content stays off public AI under NDA — we sell coherent, defensible work with a human name on the review.
Quick deck: intake form with audience, timing, and any old deck or summary. Full deck: the same, plus a 30-minute call after the NDA. You don't need a finished story — that's what discovery is for.
Editable .pptx on real-deal archetypes: board palette, action titles, clear hierarchy, charts where they earn their place. No lock-in format or watermarks — it should feel like a top advisory deliverable, because the spine is.
50% on kickoff, 50% before file release — bank, UPI, or Stripe. Retainers bill monthly. Pricing follows the USD bands on this page. One-page SOW.
No — clients span India, Europe, APAC, and the UK. Archetypes draw on global public deals. List pricing is USD; we invoice in USD or agreed FX.
Project work ships in our professional house style. Retainer clients can adopt your template family — masters, fonts, palette — so decks feel native to your organisation.
Ready when you are

Your next IC deck.
Done right.
Delivered fast.

Submit a brief. We'll sign the NDA, schedule a call, and confirm scope — usually within 24 hours. No commitment required.

NDA signed before we review a single file
Private API — zero model training on your content
Human strategist reviews every output
Files deleted on delivery confirmation
Submit a brief
We'll confirm scope within 24 hours. No payment at this stage.
→An NDA will be sent for signature before we review any materials.